Magnetismus Medicinalium
Part Seven of The Third Book of The Magnetic World: That is, On the Magnetism of Medicinal Things.
Kircher’s
Magnetismus Medicinalium
Chapter on Medicinal Magnetism from Magnes sive de Arte Magnetica (1643)
Attributed to Boston College Libraries, public domain, via Internet Archive
Medicine and the human body have always been and will always be areas of widespread interest and Kircher did not hesitate in applying magnetism to them. Kircher’s medical and bodily magnetism utilized less of the iron and mineral model, but rather focused on resonances between substances and humors. This is particularly notable as there were many popular cures based upon the properties of loadstones and iron, cures which Kircher spent time refuting in Magnes. While Kircher did believe in an intangible, somewhat mystical type of magnetism, there were clear limits and rules by which it operated, and through his discussion of these types of cures he lays these limitations out clearly. From these he then develops the ways through which magnetism functions in medicine and the body. There were several popular treatments at the time which attributed their effectiveness to the power of magnetism, from loadstone poultices, weapon cures, and magnetic transplantation. Most of the practitioners of these relied upon the mystique and incognizance around magnetism to sell them to their patients. Some writers and physicians espoused these cures, but it was more commonly a folk practice. In many of the accounts Kircher collected of the usage of these cures, he believed in their veracity but felt the action of the cure was being falsely attributed to magnetism.
Magnetic poultices were often used to cure hernias, and in more specific accounts, could be used to remove knives and other metallic objects from bodies. The hernia cures relied upon a believed inherent magical property of magnets without relying upon an iron or metal counterpart. The reports of using a salve to remove knives were based upon the relationship between the magnets and the iron of the knives. In one account, a young man swallowed a knife on a bet. This knife then stayed in his stomach for seven weeks and two days causing considerable pain and abdominal distress. Eventually his physician created a potion made of crushed magnets, attached to the knife, and shifted it into a place where a surgeon then cut it out. A similar story Kircher recounted was that of a farmer in Belorussia, where the man, who had been suffering from unrelated stomach pains, tried to use a small knife to induce vomiting. His grip on the knife failed and it slipped into his throat, where it was stuck for two days before traveling into his stomach. His doctor applied a topical salve to his stomach, which was said to draw the knife closer to the front of his torso, where a surgeon could then remove the object. Kircher, as earlier said, believed these accounts happened, but did not believe that it was the magnetic powers of the poultice which aided in the removal of the knives. He had found, accurately, that as loadstones were divided, their magnetic power dulled, with the repeated separations resulting in a lessening of the attractive force of the magnets. Each piece became muddled, fighting the others to establish polarity.[1] When combined with the sticky and oily additions of the salve, the magnetic force was all but negated. He was credulous about the abilities of magnets – if not his sources – and sought to rigorously interrogate assumptions about magnetic properties and applications based upon his own theories.
Another popular application of magnetic theory to medicine Kircher took issue with was magnetic transplantation, remedies which attempted to transfer diseases to animals or plants via the mechanism of magnetism. There were varied methods and ailments treated, but as an example, a cure for leprosy and jaundice was published in 1611 by physician Johann Burgrav in his book Cura morborum magnetic ex Theophrasiti Paraclesi mumia and is indicative of the type of treatment Kircher disavowed. Burgrav entreated physicians to take the blood of the patient and put it in an empty eggshell. The eggshell would then be sealed and given to a hen for two weeks. After which the eggshell would be fed to a dog or pig, and the disease would lodge in the animal while the patient was cured. Burgrav stated that the cure worked through putrefaction, wherein the blood became magnetic as it sat, and drew the unbalanced humors to it, allowing for the transferal between man and animal. Kircher thought all of this was utterly incorrect. Kircher had no model for “magnetizing” objects, as magnetism was an inherent trait to minerals. The time and the process of letting a hen brood on the egg were all unsupported and were only included to convince the patient of the efficacy of the cure. He did not believe that this treatment was ever effective, with successes attributable only to circumstance and coincidence wherein the disease was cured through other means.[2]
A related cure to those of magnetic transplantation, was that of the weapon salve, a cure which was growing in popularity and widespread interest in Kircher’s day. The weapon salve was essentially a way to heal a patient who had been recently and violently wounded. The physician would take part of the body of the patient, typically their blood, and apply it to the weapon which caused the wound. This was said to heal the wound even if the weapon had been removed from the body, and it was claimed that it worked through magnetic and sympathetic action between the salve and the wound, an action which could work over an infinite distance. The weapon salve was a major contemporary question, one explored by contemporary and fellow scholar of magnetism, Fludd, and it was Fludd’s theories on the functionality of the salve that Kircher primarily focused on refuting. Fludd asserted that there was a resonance in the soul which facilitated the healing, or perhaps the wounds were healed through God or angels. This spiritual nature would of course have an infinite boundary. To refute these Kircher cited that an Aristotelian soul could not have a material effect, which the healing of a wound would be. Secondly, if the cure was magnetic in nature, it could not have a spiritual origin, as magnetism was a natural not a spiritual cure. Finally, there being no limit to its range was completely irreconcilable with its proposed natural and magnetic functioning. If this material cure could work over any distance, then disease would spread with no mind to location or seasonality. The limited area of effect of natural phenomena was an intrinsic element of an agent being natural.
Kircher believed that any instances where the cure worked, it was not due to magnetic or natural influences, but was rather cacomagical, of the black arts, and was an operation of devils, where practitioners either intentionally or unintentionally invoked the help of these unnatural sources. Kircher’s conclusion about the weapon salve was that “‘ huius generis sunt pseudomagnetica illa medicamenta Daemonis schola verius, quam ex naturae phrontisterio deducta,’ a pseudomagnetic medicant that more truly comes from the school of a demon, than are taken from the teachings of nature.[3]”[4] The question of the cure was a topical one, and Kircher’s firm condemnation was not just one of intellectual pride, but impacted the physical and spiritual health of the patients and practitioners alike. In Kircher’s strong refutation, he also clarifies the limitations of his magnetic theories, especially the source of magnetism and the limitations to its range.
Kircher’s medical magnetism did not so much focus on the external magnetic qualities of the cure, as the previous examples did, but rather how the functions of attraction and repulsion in the body and how medicine and poisons interacted with those functions. In terms of the body, Kircher conceived of a model of nutrition based on attraction where the stomach was the great loadstone of the body, and other organs were smaller ones. The stomach attracted food to it, and the other organs and veins drew their vitals to themselves. Everything was hungry and brought to itself that which it needed. In a similar manner of attraction, medicinal remedies would draw excess humors to them, where they would then be expelled from the body. There were two types of pulls that medicine could have, either pulling from the center in or pushing from the center out. Kircher claimed this attraction was specifically based on the familiarity or similarity of the cure to the disease, which was why he saw it as a magnetic action – a metallic loadstone attracted iron, thus other magnetic functions could work with this same concept of similarity. In this magnetic attraction of the harmful elements, the ens of the ailment, the medicament would then be purged. The purging occurred through bodily excretions like sweat, urine, saliva, fecal matter. While this second stage was not magnetic, the entire process was initiated through the magnetic power of the medicine.[5]
In Magnes, Kircher was very interested in exploring the role of magnetism in the antidote-poison dynamic. Kircher described a poison as any and all “foreign substances which were noxious to the heart, the fountainhead of the vital spirits, and any substance directly corruptive of animal life;[6]” some were excessively hot or cold and these energies burnt or congealed the heart, respectively, while others could block the passage of blood with their humidity. Poisons were found across the organic and mineral worlds with arsenic, antimony and mercury as mineral examples while mandrake and the seeds and flowers of monkshood as organic examples Kircher cited. He also felt that some came from celestial influences, such as airborne plagues and diseases. He even included venomous animals in this model, whose toxicity came from the animals magnetically absorbing the poisons of their landscape and this poisonous element was a vital piece of their diet. To take snakes as an example, Kircher believed that they ate or breathed putrid, contagious, and noxious substances and to them it was as natural as a person’s own need for water or bread. He postulated that one could milk a viper of its venom, place it in the poisonous soils of its original habitat, and soon the venom would be replenished through the attractive quality of the soil. Because of Kircher’s belief in the power of similarity in medicine, he believed that regardless of the origin of the poison, the antidote was always magnetic and always something similar to the original poison. If one was bitten by a viper, they only had to eat it to be cured. It would draw the poisons from the fibers of the body to the antidote in the stomach, where they would cling together until they were passed.[7]
Kircher included an interesting example of utilizing the absorptive powers of serpents to cure various ailments. He had been told stories of a cave outside of the village of Brachianus in Italy, which was set into the side of a mountain with a lot of thermal activity. The various passages of the cave were reportedly filled with hot vapors, both beneficial and harmful, and at the top there was a natural spring which had been turned into a bathhouse. Surrounding this chamber were smaller passages in which hordes of snakes lived. It was through these snakes that the cure was enacted. The patient was stripped and placed in the cave. They were given enough opium to knock the patient out for two to four hours, and while asleep they would begin to sweat in the heat of the chamber. The sweat would attract the snakes living in the walls, who would then entwine themselves with the patient and absorb the harmful humors exuded by the patient. The heat of the air excited the humors and facilitated the movement of the illness in the patient, which were then attracted magnetically to the snakes. The magnetic properties of the snake were utilized to detoxify the patient while simultaneously toxifying the snake.[8]
A major flaw of Kircher’s however was quite clear in his work in medicine – his credulity. He rarely if ever questioned anecdotes and accounts, trusting that the source kept embellishments to a minimum and never lied or was false in their recollections. While he did not always agree with the conclusions reached in the original tales, he took them as concrete evidence. There was little in this section which Kircher observed or experimented with firsthand. The first section consisted mostly of Kircher’s refutation of the causes of certain cures and subsequently his theory on the system of attraction in the body and medicine, with no real doctoring by Kircher. Tarantism was a widely known and written disease, but a curiosity which rarely occurred, and one Kircher never actually witnessed. His theories were based entirely upon second and third hand accounts, many of which were from cases which happened well before his own birth. Even one of the few instances of his in-person verification or investigation into one of the stories, the cave of snakes, demonstrated this. Upon his visit he did not find any of the chambers or steam rooms infested with healing snakes, but rather a tree with a dried snakeskin attached. Even so, he still held the secondhand accounts of the cave in greater esteem than his own observations because they offered an interesting medical phenomenon. This is a pervasive problem in Magnes, but in the other sections Kircher has his own personal experimentation or observations, or even the measurements provided from other Jesuits on his request. In his writing on medicine, he is relying upon anecdotes, written and oral, and extrapolating answers by applying his own theory of magnetism to the anecdotes. It is a curious break from his previous level of experimentation.
Kircher’s medicinal and anatomical magnetism further broadened the concept of magnetism developed in Magnes. Magnetism and attraction were not the only forces operating in people; humors were an incredibly significant field of knowledge in the medical world, and it was in their balance that health was achieved. However, it was the main mechanism through which change was achieved. Where plant life was an analogy to all the parts of a loadstone, the body utilized primarily the power of attraction and sympathy. Nutrients and blood were circulated through the attractive powers of organs. Even with venomous animals, their bodies necessitated the poisons so harmful to humans, and absorbed them much in the same way that humans absorbed their nutrients. The poisons were not inherently harmful, there was no wicked intention, but the ingestion of the noxious elements unbalanced humors in the body. Kircher maintained the ability of a loadstone to attract only one unique thing (such as iron) and applied it to his model of like attracting like. Even as the logic and systems became more complex and mystical, he kept a consistent set of rules around magnetism and attempted to integrate those into the intricate reality he was working in.
[1]
Martha R. Baldwin, “Athanasius Kircher and the Magnetic Philosophy” (PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1987), 360-362.
[2]
Ibid., 372-33.
[3]
Athanasius Kircher, Magnes Sive De Arte Magnetica Opus Tripartitum, 3rd ed. (Rome: B. Deversin, 1654), https://archive.org/details/KircherMagnesSive1654, 538.
[4]
Baldwin, The Magnetic Philosophy, 363-370.
[5]
Ibid., 23, 380-381, 403.
[6]
Ibid., 381.
[7]
Ibid., 381-383.
[8]
Ibid., 385-386.